By Charlene Crowell
For the second time this year, Congress’ inability to reach consensus on essential fiscal legislation has devolved into largely partisan bickering and literal, last-minute temporary financial band-aids. On Sept. 30, the last day of the 2022-2023 federal fiscal year, a continuing resolution (CR) provided a 45-day reprieve, just in time to meet a midnight deadline that would have resulted in a federal government shutdown.
In signing the stopgap appropriations measure, President Joe Biden acknowledged its benefit and also reminded the nation of how unnecessary it really was.
“This bill ensures that active-duty troops will continue to get paid, travelers will be spared airport delays, millions of women and children will continue to have access to vital nutrition assistance, and so much more,” Biden said. “But I want to be clear: We should never have been in this position in the first place. Just a few months ago, Speaker McCarthy and I reached a budget agreement to avoid precisely this type of manufactured crisis.”
Readers may recall that in late spring and facing a first-ever national debt default, another piece of compromise legislation led to the Fiscal Accountability Act.
That eleventh-hour maneuver provided a two-year window for the Treasury Department to borrow — as needed — funds to pay the nation’s more than $31 trillion of debt. In return, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), cutbacks on discretionary spending would result in a drop in projected budget deficits of about $4.8 trillion over the next decade, and a savings of $0.5 trillion in interest. But this fiscal compromise requires Congress to return to that deferred problem in January 2025.
Neither of these developments has been well-received by the public. Only days before the Sept. 30 fiscal rescue, a consumer poll taken Sept. 19-24 by Monmouth University echoed Biden’s concerns:
74% of respondents disapproved of the job Congress is doing.
68% believed the government is on the wrong track.
64% supported compromise to enact a new budget.
“The vast majority of Americans want to avoid a shutdown. The faction who does not want any compromise may represent a small proportion of the public, but they hold outsized influence in the U.S. Capitol,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.
By mid-November, the nation will again face a shutdown at a time when families typically and excitedly finalize preparations for annual Thanksgiving gatherings. If a full federal spending plan for the new 2023-2024 fiscal year that began Oct. 1 is not approved, many will also await learning whether the federal government will be able to function during a season dedicated to blessings.
As with most budget cut decisions, potentially affected personnel are understandably anxious. Currently, 4.5 million people are either military or civilian federal employees, according to the CBO.
Similarly, agencies that administer programs that respond to vital needs are in a similar dilemma.
For example, the stark rise in requests for disaster relief from flooding, hurricanes and wildfires caused the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to recently appeal to Congress for an additional $16 billion to serve communities in distress. On Sept. 19, FEMA administrator Deanne Criswell, testifying before a House subcommittee, alerted lawmakers to the agency’s shrinking ability to keep pace with surging requests.
“On average, we are seeing a disaster declaration every three days,” Criswell testified. “We strive to be vigilant stewards of taxpayer dollars, and we are careful in our projections of how much funding will be required for the Disaster Relief Fund. However, there are times when the number and intensity of disasters outpaces appropriated funds, and we find ourselves in such a moment today.”
Funding for these and other needs now has been added to the traditional conservative calls to cut entitlement programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) more commonly known as food stamps. As of this spring, 41.9 million people who comprise 22.2 million households were enrolled in SNAP, according to Pew Research.
According to the Department of Education, an estimated 26 million students would be affected by a proposed $4 billion cut in funding schools serving low-income children. In higher education, Pell Grants that provide a critical source of financial aid for low- to moderate-income college students would be cut by 22%, and the maximum award would be lowered to $1,000 — at a time when the cost to attend college continues to soar.
Time will tell whether this Congress will face and respond to America’s real needs. But tens of millions of Americans potentially could be impacted by a federal government closure while the nation is on a ticking fiscal time clock.
Charlene Crowell is a senior policy fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending.
