Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Editorial

Wealthy Extremists Attacking Funding for Black Women Entrepreneurs Are Desperate To Preserve Systemic Inequality

Black Women Entrepreneurs

By David W. Marshall Via TriceEdneyWire.Com 

“In the face of persistent, systemic discrimination against Black people and all people of color arising from our country’s long history of racism, Ed Blum and his recently-created front group are bent on dismantling programs benefiting the Black community. They seek to kneecap any effort to undo entrenched racial inequalities and further cement the status quo of inequitable market access.” — Damon Hewitt, President and Executive Director of Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

In recent years, women entrepreneurs of color have started companies at more than four times the rate of the overall population.

In 2021, 17% of Black women were in the process of starting or running new businesses, compared to 10% of white women, and 15% of white men.

While Black women represent 14% of the female population, they account for 42% of net new women-owned businesses.

Black women business owners who apply for funding are rejected at three times the rate of white business owners. Only 3 percent of Black women-owned companies mature and survive longer than five years.   Last year, only 0.1 percent – one tenth of one percent – of venture capital funds went to Black and Latino women founders.

Anti-racial justice activist Edward Blum, backed by wealthy, dark-money foundations, contends the system is rigged – in favor of Black women.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Blum has filed suit against the Fearless Fund, a venture capital firm that has awarded $26 million in investments and $3 million in grants in the last four years to more than 40 businesses led by women of color.

Blum, who was behind the lawsuit that resulted in the U.S. Supreme Court decision that ended affirmative action in college admissions, is on a well-funded and increasingly successful crusade to preserve systemic racial inequities and the advantages they afford people like himself and his backers.

As if to add insult to injury, he is suing under a post-Civil War law intended to protect Black Americans from racial discrimination.

His lawsuit – like his many others – makes a mockery of both the law and the very idea of racial equity.

The National Urban League has joined in filing an amicus brief in the case, along with Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, National Action Network, NAACP, National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, and LatinoJustice PRLDEF. As the brief explains, Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was explicitly designed to further the aims of the Thirteenth Amendment by creating a remedy for discrimination against Black people that hampered their ability to enter into contracts and fully participate in the nation’s economy.

Programs like Fearless Fund, which strengthen Black Americans’ rights to equal participation in the marketplace, are indisputably authorized under federal law.

Fearless Fund founders Ayana Parsons and Arian Simone, both Black women with deep experience in business, estimated they took 300 meetings with potential investors before getting their first $5 million in funding.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Blum and his extremist backers apparently don’t think 300 is enough.

ADVERTISEMENT

News Video

IMM Mask Promos

I Messenger Media Radio Shows

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Articles

Lifestyle

How spiritual growth, a journey to self-love and a dip into her “soft life” era are fueling the superstar sprinter.

Lifestyle

Every year, people all over take part in a simple yet powerful tradition—choosing a single word to define and guide their year.

News

By Anthony Council In one of the most stunning upsets of the Texas high school football season, the North Crowley Panthers (15-0) dethroned defending...

News

The 12-year-old wore a strapless gown to the "Mufasa" movie premiere, which some internet users thought was inappropriate.

Advertisement